This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Reaction of the ruthenium allenylidene complex [Ru]═C═C═CPh 2 ( 1, [Ru] = Cp(PPh 3 ) 2 Ru) with the propargylic Grignard reagent R-C≡CCH 2 MgBr (R = CH 3, CH 2 CH 3, Ph) yielded a mixture of two acetylide complexes. The major products, [Ru]C≡CCPh 2 C(R)═C═CH 2 ( 2a, R = CH 3; 2b, R = CH 2 CH 3; 2c, R = Ph), have an allenyne moiety, and the minor ones, [Ru]C≡CCPh 2 CH 2 C≡CR ( 3a, R = CH 3; 3b, R = CH 2 CH 3; 3c, R = Ph), have a diyne ligand. The reaction of similar propargyl Grignard reagent HC≡CCH 2 MgBr with 1 yielded only the diyne complex 3d . Treatment of complexes 2a − 2c with HBF 4 afforded the cyclization complexes 5a − 5c, respectively, proceeding via a vinylidene intermediate. The cyclization of the allenyl and the vinylidene groups is accompanied with a phenyl group migration. Complex 5b is fully characterized by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Similar cyclization of complexes 2a and 2b, catalyzed by a Au phosphine complex, gave the ruthenium vinylidene complexes 6a and 6b, respectively, with different selectivity from that of the protonation reaction. Au-catalyzed cyclization of the diyne complex 3d yielded 6d, which is fully characterized by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: