Why the study?
Can the number of VKA dose changes and INR tests predict a TTR ≤ 65% in patients on long-term warfarin?
Can the number of VKA dose changes and INR tests predict a TTR ≤ 65% in patients on long-term warfarin?
A simple count of VKA dose changes (≥3) or INR tests (≥9) over 6 months can identify patients with poor anticoagulation control (TTR ≤ 65%) who may benefit from switching to direct oral anticoagulants.
May flag poor TTR via simple counts; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding DOAC switches.
In many countries, new oral anticoagulants are only covered for patients with suboptimal anticoagulation control on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The quality of VKA management is often reported using the time in therapeutic range (TTR). We sought to predict a TTR 65% or less using a surrogate measure [number of changes in VKA dose and number of international normalized ratio (INR) tests] that could be easily determined by primary care physicians. This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients whose VKA therapy was managed in a specialized anticoagulation clinic. Patients were dichotomized according to their TTR in the past 6 months (TTR > or ≤ 65%). The ability of the number of INR tests and VKA dose changes to predict TTR group was assessed using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The analyses included 1381 patients with a median age of 63 years. The mean TTR was 81% (interquartile range 70-90) and 17.4% of patients had a TTR 65% or more. Based on the ROC curve, patients were stratified according to whether they had either 3 or more dose changes or 9 or more INR tests within the last 6 months. The sensitivity to identify patients with TTR 65% or less was 87% and the specificity was 63%. The number of dose changes and the number of INR tests might be used as indicators of TTR; they could offer a simple way for clinicians to identify patients who are good candidates for the new oral anticoagulants. However, external validation studies in different clinical settings are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrier et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: