Why the study?
Is dabigatran etexilate economically beneficial compared to standard treatments for stroke prevention in subjects with atrial fibrillation?
Is dabigatran etexilate economically beneficial compared to standard treatments for stroke prevention in subjects with atrial fibrillation?
Dabigatran appears economically beneficial for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, especially in patients with high stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage risk, or poor warfarin control.
May inform targeted dabigatran use in high-risk AF; extends cost-effectiveness evidence to subgroups with poor warfarin control.
Dabigatran etexilate is a newly approved agent for prophylaxis of stroke in atrial fibrillation. Through narrative review, the authors assess evidence of the efficacy of dabigatran in stroke prevention, focusing on the multicenter, randomized trial RE-LY. The authors complement this with a review of the clinical efficacy of standard treatments (antiplatelet and warfarin). Finally, the authors present a systematic review of published studies describing the economics of dabigatran. Our systematic search gave six economic reviews from a variety of healthcare systems (the USA, Canada and the UK) and utilizing different economic models. Analyses suggest economic benefit of high- or sequential-dose dabigatran, particularly when stroke risk is high; intracerebral hemorrhage risk is high or warfarin control is poor. However, questions remain around dabigatran tolerability, compliance and possible unexpected adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marshall et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: