Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in an unselected patient population with hard-to-heal ulcers from baseline through healing and at follow-up 6 months after healing. METHOD: Fifty patients were recruited and the sex and age of the patient and the ulcer aetiology, duration, and size were recorded. The generic instrument EQ-5D was used for two purposes. The first was to investigate the feasibility of this instrument for assessing HRQoL in this patient group. The second was to see if the EQ-5D results would add information to the Swedish Registry of Ulcer Treatment (RUT), a national quality registry which includes variables for pain, disturbed sleep, and mobility. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in HRQoL between patients with an open ulcer and those with a healed ulcer (p=0.02), but no significant difference between patients with a just-healed ulcer and patients at follow-up six months after ulcer healing (p=0.08). Sex, age, and length of ulcer duration at inclusion did not influence HRQoL (p=0.55, p=0.4, and p=0.9, respectively). Ulcer size seemed to influence HRQoL, though not significantly (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that HRQoL was improved after ulcer healing. Pain, as one of the five constructs measured by the EQ-5D, was significantly associated with open ulcers. The results from the EQ-5D questionnaire were hard to interpret in terms of capturing HRQoL in this unselected patient population. Despite some limitations, we consider that the simplicity of EQ-5D could make it feasible to use in the clinical setting. However, the results from EQ-5D did not add consistent information to RUT; therefore, this questionnaire will not be included in the registry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Öien et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: