Why the study?
Does prior warfarin use with subtherapeutic INR increase the risk of adverse outcomes after thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
Does prior warfarin use with subtherapeutic INR increase the risk of adverse outcomes after thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
In acute ischemic stroke patients receiving thrombolysis, prior warfarin use with subtherapeutic INR is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage but no significant difference in mortality or functional outcomes.
Urges sICH caution with thrombolysis after subtherapeutic warfarin; confirms no difference in functional outcome or mortality.
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether thrombolytic therapy is safe in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who are treated with warfarin and have a subtherapeutic international normalised ratio (INR) at stroke onset. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of the literature and included studies that assessed the relation between prior warfarin use with subtherapeutic INR and outcome after intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke. Outcome measures were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH), modified Rankin scale score 0-2 and mortality. Second, the authors performed a meta-analysis of the included studies. RESULTS: Seven studies with 3631 patients were included. 240 (6.6%) patients used warfarin before stroke onset. The risk of SICH was increased in the warfarin group (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 5.9. p=0.02). There was no significant difference, however, in functional outcome (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.2, p=0.32) or death from all causes (OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.9 to 1.8). DISCUSSION: The risk of SICH after thrombolytic therapy is increased in patients using warfarin with subtherapeutic INR levels. The authors found no evidence of an increase in death from all causes or worsening of functional outcome in warfarin treated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miedema et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: