We present the methodology for a joint cosmological analysis of weak gravitational lensing from the fourth data release of the ESO -Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) and galaxy clustering from the partially overlapping Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) and the 2-degree Field Lensing Survey (2dFLenS). Cross-correlations between BOSS and 2dFLenS galaxy positions and galaxy ellipticities have been incorporated into the analysis, necessitating the development of a hybrid model of non-linear that blends perturbative and non-perturbative approaches, and an assessment of signal contributions by astrophysical effects. weak lensing signals were measured consistently via Fourier-space statistics that are insensitive to the survey mask and display levels of mode mixing. The calibration of photometric redshift distributions and multiplicative gravitational shear bias has been , and a more complete tally of residual calibration uncertainties was propagated into the likelihood. A dedicated suite of more 20 000 mocks was used to assess the performance of covariance models and to quantify the impact of survey geometry and variations of survey depth on signals and their errors. The sampling distributions for the likelihood and the χ 2 goodness-of-fit have been validated, with proposed changes for calculating the effective number of degrees of freedom. The prior volume explicitly mapped, and a more conservative, wide top-hat prior on the key structure growth parameter S 8 = σ8 (Ωm/0.3)1/2 was . The prevalent custom of reporting S 8 weak lensing constraints via point estimates derived from its marginal posterior highlighted to be easily misinterpreted as yielding systematically low values of S 8, and an alternative estimator and associated interval are proposed. Known systematic effects pertaining to weak lensing modelling and inference are shown to bias S 8 by more than 0.1 standard deviations, with the caveat that no conclusive validation data exist for models of intrinsic galaxy alignments. to the previous KiDS analyses, S 8 constraints are expected to improve by 20 % for weak lensing alone and by 29 % for the analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joachimi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: