Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The trilobite genus Onaraspis has a history of taxonomic controversy. The species of this genus have been assigned to seven different families and divided into the genera Onaraspis and Myopsolenites by various authors. A careful systematic revision of Onaraspis from the Iberian Chains and other regions, in conjunction with related genera such as Luciaspis and Paulaspis , allows for assignment of these taxa to the Bathynotidae due to significant thoracic similarities. Additional genera from the Iberian Chains assigned to the Bathynotidae include Realaspis and Aragotus . Moreover, the morphometric analyses of Onaraspis species provide no morphological evidence for separation into two distinct genera. The variability of the characters included in the diagnosis of Myopsolenites , in conjunction with that of other characters representing the majority of the variation between species of the clade, is comparable between the two proposed genera. Consequently, Myopsolenites is regarded as a junior synonym of Onaraspis . Two new species, Onaraspis schmitzi n. sp. and Paulaspis schmidtthomei n. sp., are described. The Bathynotidae of the Iberian Chains show a wide stratigraphic range extending from the middle Marianian to upper Bilbilian (uppermost Stage 3 and Stage 4 of Cambrian Series 2). However, the majority of Onaraspis species are found in the upper part of the Cambrian Stage 4, which is more or less comparable with the Bathynotus kueichouensis - Ovatoryctocara sinensis Zone. An international correlation chart showing the stratigraphic ranges of genera assigned to the Bathynotidae is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sepúlveda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: