Why the study?
Does a heparin dosing nomogram improve target APTT achievement in patients with venous thromboembolism in a community hospital?
Does a heparin dosing nomogram improve target APTT achievement in patients with venous thromboembolism in a community hospital?
The use of a heparin dosing nomogram in a non-research community hospital setting improves the adequacy of anticoagulation with low bleeding risks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nomogram use was associated with higher target APTT achievement in community VTE; supports adoption but leaves open outcome impact.
BACKGROUND: The application of a heparin dosing nomogram in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism resulted in improvement of heparin therapy in clinical research settings. In 1992 a heparin nomogram was introduced in our hospital, which is a community hospital where anticoagulant therapy is supervised by the attending physicians. We studied whether comparable improvements were achieved in such a non-surveyed clinical setting. METHODS: Patients were identified from computerized discharge records, and classified into a pre-nomogram (discharged in 1990 or 1991) and a nomogram patient group (discharged in 1993 or 1994). The use of the nomogram was encouraged but the application remained on a voluntary basis. Since the definition of the target APTT range was different in the pre-nomogram period as compared to the nomogram period, a formal analysis of pre- and post-nomogram results was not considered justified. RESULTS: The APTT ratio, six hours after the start of heparin treatment, was below the predefined lower limit in 72% of 127 patients in the pre-nomogram group and in 13% of 127 patients in the nomogram group. During 1043 days heparin therapy in the nomogram group the morning APTT ratio was subtherapeutic in 8%. In 58% of all APTT results the physician responded according to the nomogram. The subsequent APTT was in the target range in 64% of the cases compared to 31% if the adjustement was not performed according to the nomogram (P<.0001). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 3.1% in the pre-nomogram period and in 0.7% in the nomogram period. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that the introduction of a heparin dosing nomogram in a non-research clinical setting results in more adequate heparin anticoagulation with low risks of bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Büller et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: