Why the study?
Does brief counselling without anxiolytics improve psychiatric and social outcomes compared to anxiolytic medication in patients with minor affective disorder?
Does brief counselling without anxiolytics improve psychiatric and social outcomes compared to anxiolytic medication in patients with minor affective disorder?
Brief counselling without anxiolytics is as effective as anxiolytic medication for patients with minor affective disorder in general practice.
Supports brief counselling without anxiolytics as first-line for minor affective disorders in general practice; confirms equivalence to medication in primary-care RCT.
Ninety one patients with new episodes of minor affective disorder were selected by their general practitioners as suitable for anxiolytic medication. Half the patients were allocated randomly to a drug-group (anxiolytic medication), and half to a non-drug group (brief counselling without anxiolytics). Psychiatric and social assessments were made (i) at initial consultation when treatment was started; (ii) one month later; (iii) seven months later. Before treatment the two groups were similar on all main variables. On the General Health Questionnaire, 85 per cent of patients were psychiatric cases before treatment, 40 per cent at one month and 30 per cent at seven months. Similar improvements were found with other measures of psychiatric state (Profile of Mood States; Present State Examination) and social functioning (SAS-M). Improvements were similar and parallel in the two groups. Neither group of patients increased their consumption of alcohol, tobacco or non-prescribed drugs. The non-drug group did not make increased demands on the doctors' time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catalán et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: