Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A five-residue loop structure in basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) which extends from amino acid residue 118 to residue 122 was replaced, by cassette mutagenesis, with the corresponding seven-residue loop structure from the structural homologue acidic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-1) or the corresponding five-residue loop from interleukin-1 beta to give FGF-2LA and FGF-2LI, respectively. The mutants were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity, and their heparin and receptor binding and biological properties were examined. The ability of FGF-2LA to induce endothelial cell proliferation was the same as that of FGF-2. Affinities of the mutants to heparin and to cells that express FGF receptor-1 (FGFR-1) were identical to those of the wild-type protein. The role of the loop structure in FGF-1 and FGF-2 was elucidated by using soluble FGF receptor systems, which display distinct ligand binding specificities. Thus, FGF-2LA bound, with the same affinity as FGF-1 and FGF-2, to FGFR-1 and FGFR-2, whereas only FGF-1 and the FGF-1 loop-containing mutant, FGF-2LA, bound to the keratinocyte growth factor receptor. A change in receptor binding specificity was not observed with the FGF-2LI engineered mutant. That the binding specificity of FGF-2 was dramatically altered by transfer of a loop structure from FGF-1 to resemble the binding profile of the donor protein provides strong evidence that this motif is a receptor binding specificity determinant of fibroblast growth factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seddon et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: