Why the study?
Does increased BMI (overweight or obesity) improve survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?
Does increased BMI (overweight or obesity) improve survival in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?
After adjusting for confounders such as frailty, increased BMI does not confer a survival advantage (obesity paradox) following TAVI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No BMI-related survival advantage after TAVI adjustment; leaves open the obesity paradox pending further study.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on short- and midterm outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: Although obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular mortality, numerous studies reported a beneficial effect of obesity on survival in patients with cardiovascular disease and in patients after cardiac interventions. Moreover, all previous reports examining the relation between BMI and outcomes following TAVI have underscored the "obesity paradox" in these patients. METHODS: During a 3 year period, 805 patients with severe aortic stenosis that underwent TAVI at our institute were evaluated. Based on baseline BMI, patients were classified as normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2) ), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m(2) ), or obese (≥30 kg/m(2) ). TAVI endpoints, device success, and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions. RESULTS: Obese patients were significantly younger, had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and chronic lung disease, and had lower prevalence of frailty. Device success was similar between the 3 groups. All-cause mortality up to 30 days was 2.9% (10/340) vs 4.5% (12/268) vs 0.5% (1/186) in patients with normal weight, overweight, and obesity, respectively (p = 0.048). In a multivariable model, overweight and obese patients had similar overall mortality compared to patients with normal weight. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for the existence of an obesity paradox following TAVI. Correction for possible confounders such as frailty in the present cohort may explain the discrepancy between the current report and the previous reports that suggested a protective effect for increased BMI following TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abramowitz et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: