Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of left atrial low-voltage area (LVA)-guided substrate modification catheter ablation in patients with AF.
Does LVA-guided substrate modification catheter ablation improve freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does LVA-guided substrate modification catheter ablation improve freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence in patients with atrial fibrillation?
LVA-guided substrate modification ablation significantly reduces atrial tachycardia recurrence in patients with AF without increasing procedural complications.
LVA ablation may be considered to improve AF ablation success; confirms benefit of substrate modification in meta-analysis.
Aims : This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LVA-guided substrate modification catheter ablation in patients with AF. Methods: Systematic searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were performed from inception to February 2022 for all available studies. The effect estimates were combined with the Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the sources of statistical heterogeneity. Results: A total of 16 studies involving 1931 subjects (mean age: 61±10 years, 69% male) were identified. All studies included patients with paroxysmal AF, nonparoxysmal AF, or both. At a mean follow-up of 18.9 months, patients who underwent LVA ablation had significantly higher freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence than patients who underwent control ablation (67.6% vs. 48.9%, risk ratios [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.76, P<0.001), with 34% relative risk and 18.7% absolute risk reductions in all-atrial tachycardia recurrence. Six studies assessed the incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) between the 2 groups. However, no stroke/TIA occurred in most of these studies. Furthermore, the rates of acute procedural complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups (LVA ablation 2.4% vs. control ablation 3.3%, RR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.30-1.07, P =0.08). Conclusion : LVA-guided substrate modification ablation appears to have a significant benefit in improving freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence. Importantly, this benefit is achieved without a significant increase in the rates of acute procedural complications or cerebral thromboembolic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: