Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Web 2.0 applications such as YouTube have made it likely that students participate in online back-and-forth exchanges that influence their rhetorical literacy. Because of the back-and-forth nature of online communities, we turn to the procedural, critical, and progressive qualities of dialectic as a means of accounting for what makes public deliberation effective and how we can teach students to deliberate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: