This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In several studies on asset markets in a laboratory environment, observed trading activity is inconsistent with theoretical no-trade predictions. In a series of treatments, we systematically analyze violations and violators of the no-trade prediction and find that there are fewer violations with the manipulations but the trading activity does not cease completely. Three observations further contribute to a better understanding of this residual trading activity. First, traders exploit all available profitable trading opportunities even when transactions offer only a small profit. Second, unprofitable trades are significantly more concentrated among a few subjects than profitable trades, implying that only a minority is responsible for the observed trading activity. Third, a better understanding of the market mechanism significantly affects traders’ ability to generate profitable trades. In sum, these results strengthen the confidence in the well-functioning of laboratory asset markets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleinlercher et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: