Why the study?
Does sympathetic nerve stimulation differ from intra-arterial norepinephrine in affecting vascular pressures and resistances in perfused dog forelegs?
Does sympathetic nerve stimulation differ from intra-arterial norepinephrine in affecting vascular pressures and resistances in perfused dog forelegs?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sympathetic nerve stimulation and intra-arterial norepinephrine produce distinct patterns of segmental vascular resistance changes in the canine foreleg.
The effects of stimulating sympathetic nerve fibers and of intra-arterial norepinephrine on vascular pressures and resistances in muscle and paw of perfused forelegs of dogs were compared by means of small vessel cannulations and during constant blood flow. The following conclusions may be drawn: 1. Sympathetic nerve stimulation causes constriction of the large artery segment predominantly. The constriction appears to be most intense at the level of the carpus. 2. The large artery constriction at the level of the carpus diverts blood flow away from the paw and into more proximal muscular parts of the foreleg. 3. Changes in segmental vascular resistances during nerve stimulation differ in paw and muscle. In the paw, venous segments constrict markedly whereas small vessel segments usually dilate and may constrict minimally; but in the muscle, arterial and small vessel segments constrict more than venous segments. 4. The effects of norepinephrine differ from those of nerve stimulation. Norepinephrine causes constriction of small vessels in paw predominantly. Constriction of both small vessel and venous segments in paw exceeds constriction of corresponding segments in muscle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abboud et al. (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: