It is shown, for q-profiles which lead to a disruption, that the control of the amplitude of the 2/1 tearing mode avoids the disruption, q-profiles measured in T–4 and PLT before a major disruption have been studied. Two methods of controlling the 2/1 mode amplitude have been considered: 1) Feedback stabilization with the feedback signal locked in phase with the 2/1 mode. The major disruption is suppressed if the feedback parameters (time delay and gain) are properly chosen. Otherwise, only a delay in the disruption is observed. 2) Heating slightly outside the q = 2 surface. Modifying the current density profile can decrease, and even eliminate, the 2/1 –3/2 interaction. In this way, the disruption is avoided. –In both cases it is only necessary to decrease the 2/1 mode amplitude to suppress the disruption. It is not always necessary to stabilize the unstable modes fully.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holmes et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: