Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Holcombe et al. (2026) propose practical mechanisms for making specific non-author research contributions more visible through ORCID identifiers, CRediT information, manuscript submission systems, and JATS-XML metadata. We support this aim but argue that its implementation requires a clearer distinction between two questions: how substantive contributions should be formally credited, and how broadly authors may acknowledge the human relationships and circumstances underlying scholarly work. We propose two complementary categories: a structured Contributor Listing for machine-readable author and non-author contributions and narrative Acknowledgments for gratitude and contextual recognition. This distinction would advance visibility and accountability without allowing the standardization of contributor credit to become the standardization of gratitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yana Suchikova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: