Why the study?
Does Lipoprotein(a) apheresis lower Lp(a) levels and prevent atherosclerosis progression in patients with elevated Lp(a) and prior myocardial infarction?
Does Lipoprotein(a) apheresis lower Lp(a) levels and prevent atherosclerosis progression in patients with elevated Lp(a) and prior myocardial infarction?
Lipoprotein(a) apheresis effectively lowers Lp(a) levels and may retard the progression of atherosclerosis in patients with severe coronary heart disease and selective Lp(a) elevation.
Hypothesis-generating for Lp(a) apheresis post-MI; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. It is similar to low-density lipoprotein with an additional molecule of apo A covalently linked to apo B-100 by one disulfide bridge. Apo A is highly homologous to plasminogen. The kringle 4 motive of plasminogen is repeated between 10 and 40 times in apo (a). Currently, there is no drug therapy available to lower Lp(a). Since October 1993, we have carried out over 160 immunoadsorption treatments on 3 patients with elevated Lp(a) as their only risk factor and a history of myocardial infarction. Lp(a) was removed from plasma by sepharose coupled anti-Lp(a) columns. Lp(a) levels were lowered from above 170 mg/dl to below 30 mg/dl immediately after Lp(a) apheresis. To achieve this, the patient's plasma volume had to be treated 2 to 3 times. Nonspecific protein loss during column changes remained negligible. There were no serious unwanted effects during or after treatment. Minor circulatory problems (tachycardia, flush) occurred in 11% of the treatments but only with plasma flow rates above 55 ml/min. In 1 patient, coronary angiography after 2 years and in another patient after 1 year showed no progression. The third patient has not yet had repeat coronary angiography. Like the others, he reported subjective improvement after 1 year of apheresis. It is concluded that Lp(a) apheresis may retard progression of atherosclerosis in patients with selective Lp(a) elevation. Further studies to support this hypothesis are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullrich et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: