Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 1989Head & Neck

Radiographic evaluation for nasal dysfunction: Computed tomography versus plain films

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TDTerence M. DavidsonCanterbury Christ Church UniversityFBFolke BrahmeUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsMGMitchell E. GallagherUniversity of California, San Diego

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Davidson et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85589537bcb8373dad98edhttps://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2880110505
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Computed tomography of the nasopharynx: normal and variants of normal.1980 · 62 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of Mucoceles of the Paranasal Sinuses with Computed Tomography1979 · 82 citations
  3. 3Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems.1987 · 56 citations
  4. 4Evaluation and treatment of smell dysfunction1988 · 21 citations
  5. 5Computed tomography of the nose1982 · 12 citations