Why the study?
The study was conducted to explore the effect of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and area deprivation on post-discharge outcomes in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
Do race/ethnicity, insurance status, and area deprivation affect post-discharge outcomes in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Do race/ethnicity, insurance status, and area deprivation affect post-discharge outcomes in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?
White patients and those from less deprived areas had higher readmission risks following hip fracture surgery, contrasting with previous knowledge.
Findings should not yet change practice; challenges prior disparity assumptions and leaves open mechanisms in older hip fracture patients.
This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records to explore the effect of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and area deprivation on post-discharge outcomes in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery between 2015 and 2018 ( N = 1,150). Inverse probability of treatment weight-adjusted regression analysis was used to identify the effects of the predictors on outcomes. White patients had higher 90- and 365-day readmission risks than Black patients and higher all-period readmissions than the Other racial/ethnic (Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, and Multicultural) group ( p < .000). Black patients had a higher risk of 30- and 90-day readmission than the Other racial/ethnic group ( p < .000). Readmission risk across 1-year follow-up was generally higher among patients from less deprived areas than more deprived areas ( p < .05). The 90- and 365-day mortality risk was lower for patients from less deprived areas (vs. more deprived areas) and patients with Medicare Advantage (vs. Medicare), respectively ( p < .05). Our findings can guide efforts to identify patients for additional post-discharge support. Nevertheless, the findings regarding readmission risks contrast with previous knowledge and thus require more validation studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: