The mechanism by which ubiquitous adenine nucleotide-gated K(IR)6.0(4)/SUR(4) channels link membrane excitability with cellular metabolism is controversial. Is a decreased sensitivity to inhibitory ATP required, or is the Mg-ADP/ATP-dependent stimulatory action of the ATPase, sulfonylurea receptor (SUR), on K(IR) sufficient to elicit a physiologically significant open channel probability? To evaluate the roles of nucleotide inhibition versus stimulation, we compared K(IR)6.1-based K(NDP) channels with K(IR)6.2-based K(ATP) channels and all possible K(IR)6.1/6.2 hybrids. Although K(NDP) channels are thought to be poorly sensitive to inhibitory ATP and to require Mg-nucleotide diphosphates for activity, we demonstrate that, like K(ATP), and hybrid channels, they are inhibited with an IC(50(ATP)) 100-fold lower than [ATP](i). K(IR)6.1 is, however, more efficiently stimulated by SUR than K(IR)6.2, thus providing a mechanism for differential nucleotide regulation, in addition to the known differential interactions of Mg-nucleotides with SUR isoforms. The on-cell and spontaneous activities of K(NDP), K(ATP), and hybrid channels identified in native cells, are different; thus, their similar IC(50(ATP)) values argue the regulatory "beta" SUR subunits play a preeminent role in coupling excitation to metabolism and pose questions about the physiologic significance of models, which assume the ATP insensitivity of open K(IR)s.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babenko et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: