Rabbit sino-atrial node cells express a distinct isoform of the ATP-sensitive K+ channel that plays a role in modulating pacemaker activity.
May modulate rabbit SA node activity; leaves open human relevance and clinical translation.
Single myocytes were isolated from rabbit sino-atrial (SA) node by enzymatic dissociation. Spontaneous pacemaker activity, whole-cell and single-channel currents were recorded under conditions known to modulate ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channels. 2. The KATP channel openers, cromakalim and pinacidil, slowed or abolished the pacemaker activity, and caused hyperpolarization of the maximum diastolic potential (MDP). Glibenclamide, a KATP channel blocker, reversed these effects. Cromakalim- and pinacidil-activated currents reversed near the potassium equilibrium potential, EK. Glibenclamide had no effect on the L-type calcium current, ICa(L), the hyperpolarization-activated inward current, If, or the delayed rectifier potassium current, IK. 3. Sodium cyanide, which inhibits mitochondrial ATP production, induced a macroscopic current that reversed near EK and was blocked by glibenclamide. 4. In excised, inside-out patches from SA node cells, single KATP channels showed a slope conductance of 52 +/- 8 pS (mean +/- S.D.) when measurements were made at negative voltages in symmetric, 140 mM K+. Channels from ventricular myocytes showed a somewhat larger slope conductance (70 +/- 5 pS). 5. Raising the intracellular ATP concentration caused a concentration-dependent reduction in the open probability of the KATP channels (IC50, 16 microM; Hill coefficient, approximately 1; at both pH 7.4 and 6.8). 6. In excised inside-out patches, cromakalim or pinacidil induced significant increases in KATP channel activity in the presence of 50 microM or 1 mM intracellular ATP. This channel activity was blocked by glibenclamide. 7. Our results suggest that sino-atrial node cells express a distinct isoform of KATP channel which may play an important role in pharmacological and pathophysiological modulation of pacemaker activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: