This review highlights the pathology, diagnosis, management, and prevention of increasingly common electrophysiologic cardiac device infections.
Alerts clinicians to rising CIED infection burden; leaves open optimal prevention strategies pending prospective trials.
Infections related to electrophysiologic cardiac device placement are increasing dramatically and are associated with adverse outcomes. With the US population aging and living longer, cardiac devices are utilized in an older population with significant comorbidities, making the threat from infectious complications significant. Electrophysiologic cardiac devices typically include an implanted pulse generator and an intravascular lead. Infection may occur at any component of the device, resulting in varied presentations. Bacteremia in cardiac device recipients may reflect primary generator pocket infection, or alternate sources of bacteremia may result in secondary hematogenous lead infection. This review focuses on the pathology, diagnosis, management and prevention of electrophysiologic cardiac device infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Z. Uslan (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: