PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of a hydrodynamic rheolytic thrombectomy device for rapid percutaneous treatment of acute thromboembolic occlusions of native lower-extremity arteries and bypass grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 50 patients, thrombectomy was performed with the rheolytic catheter at four centers. Patients had acute occlusions of native lower-extremity arteries (n = 39) or acute thrombosis of lower-limb bypass grafts (n = 11). Estimated occlusion age was 5 days +/- 5. Mean thrombus length was 15 cm +/- 11. Clinical success was measured on a scale of -3 (deterioration) to +3 (improvement) with established criteria. RESULTS: With the thrombectomy catheter, the majority of thrombus material was removed and antegrade blood flow was reestablished in 45 (90%) patients. Technical success (residual luminal narrowing < 50%) was 52% with use of the device alone. Adjunctive therapy was performed in 45 patients. Clinical improvement after intervention was +3 in 25 (50%) patients, +2 in 10 (20%), +1 in six (12%), and 0 (no improvement) in nine (18%). Clinically unimportant complications related to use of the device were one (2%) distal embolization and two (4%) dissections. Laboratory analysis revealed hemolysis without clinical sequelae. Primary patency rates were 76% after 30 days, 74% after 3 months, and 69% after 1 year. CONCLUSION: The hydrodynamic catheter appears to be safe and effective for rapid thrombectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: