Computational study demonstrates improved settlement predictions in soft clay under nonlinear compression, highlighting the impact of stress-level hardening curvature.
Soft-ground finite-element analyses commonly reduce curved Oedometer compression to one constant slope, obscuring where stress-level curvature affects boundary-value predictions. AJOP-T embeds the differentiable Arc Joint via Optimum Parameters map in continuous teardrop bounding-surface plasticity while retaining the inherited yield geometry, non-associated flow, radial mapping and SMP-transformed stress. High-order denotes only the map’s derivative hierarchy: its first two derivatives define tangent hardening and hardening curvature, not gradient, fractional, nonlocal or rate order. This first-phase formulation is deliberately rate-independent and retains constant κ to isolate compression-map hardening; time-dependent and nonlinear cyclic swelling responses are outside its claims. The formulation recovers constant-slope hardening asymptotically, yields a closed-form admissibility boundary, is invariant under SMP, and recovers the parent isotropic normally consolidated settlement equation. Four natural-clay compression maps were fitted; triaxial evidence is fitted for comparison except for one held-out Eastern Osaka extension path. Three implementations agree to at least five significant figures. Paired undrained strip-footing analyses reduce centre settlement by 31.8% in the curved regime but only 0.27% near the high-stress asymptote. A predicted 1.6% low-stress strength-ratio drift is below the reviewed data scatter and is not claimed as experimentally validated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatwong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: