Comparative field study reveals biochar combined with urea lowers nitrogen losses and greenhouse gas potential in flooded paddy fields, highlighting its promise for sustainable rice production.
Balancing nitrogen (N) productivity with environmental sustainability is critical in flooded rice systems, where N losses are substantial. Rice straw, a major agricultural waste, can be converted into biochar to improve nutrient retention and yield. This study compared four treatments in a continuously flooded tropical paddy field: an unfertilized control, chemical fertilizer (CF), rice straw with CF (RS + CF), and rice straw-derived biochar with CF (BC + CF). We quantified major N-loss pathways, agronomic efficiency of applied N (NAE), and N gas-related global warming potential (GWP N ). The results indicate that BC + CF reduced total N loss to 33% of total N input, compared with 38% under RS + CF and 43% under CF. Compared with CF, BC + CF significantly reduced NH 4 + –N leaching, NH 3 volatilization, and N 2 O emissions through enhanced soil cation exchange capacity and mineral N retention. In contrast, RS + CF significantly increased NH 4 + –N leaching but significantly reduced NH 3 volatilization and N 2 O emissions. Both RS + CF and BC + CF significantly reduced GWP N relative to CF, while BC + CF achieved the highest grain yield and NAE. These findings demonstrate that the co-application of rice straw-derived biochar with chemical fertilizer is a promising strategy for mitigating N losses and improving agronomic efficiency in flooded rice systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Somboon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: