Spatiotemporal modeling study reveals hybrid transmission dynamics in urban dengue surveillance, indicating targeted intervention pathways without mobility data.
Infectious disease epidemics in complex urban environments often exhibit hybrid diffusion dynamics that combine localized expansion with sporadic long-distance relocation. Traditional spatial statistical models, such as Conditional Autoregressive (CAR) models, typically rely on fixed, adjacency-based spatial weight matrices, creating risks of structural misspecification when transmission pathways deviate from geographic proximity. To address this limitation, this study develops a Bayesian spatiotemporal modeling framework that treats the spatial weight matrix W as an estimable quantity rather than a fixed input, employing an adaptive CAR prior to infer latent diffusion networks directly from routine surveillance data. This reframing allows the model to distinguish expansion-type from relocation-type connectivity links without requiring pre-specified mobility data. The framework is first evaluated through simulation experiments, demonstrating strong capacity to identify the structural distinction between expansion-type and relocation-type diffusion links (Pearson’s correlation > 0.8). We then apply the model to the 2015 dengue outbreak in Tainan, Taiwan. The inferred diffusion network reveals a distinct hybrid topology: the urban core is sustained by a mixture of contiguous expansion links (30%) and within-cluster relocation links (46%), whereas peripheral districts are predominantly seeded by external relocation links (67%) originating from the core. Community detection further delineates spatial clusters that reflect underlying socio-spatial interactions rather than administrative boundaries. By reframing the adaptive CAR prior as a network inference mechanism, this study provides a flexible and data-driven approach for uncovering complex diffusion pathways and guiding targeted surveillance strategies in settings where detailed mobility data are unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chien et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: