Preclinical study demonstrates that microsphere scaffolds delivering mesenchymal extracellular vesicles enhance motor recovery in rats with spinal cord injury, suggesting a viable neural repair...
Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to significant locomotor, sensory, and autonomic deficits and remains refractory to current therapies. Extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC-EVs) are potential acellular therapeutic strategy for tissue regeneration, but rapid clearance and poor lesion retention limit their efficacy; combining MSC-EVs with biomaterial depots can improve local retention and sustained release. Here, we engineered porous gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) microspheres using a self-designed simple microfluidic device. MSC-EVs were physically loaded into porous GelMA microspheres, which were subsequently embedded into a GelMA scaffold to form GelMA microsphere-embedded GelMA scaffolds loaded with MSC-EVs (GMS-EVs scaffolds). Based on the satisfactory elastic modulus, suitable porous organized structure, and good biocompatibility, the GMS-EVs scaffolds could achieve local retention and sustained release of MSC-EVs both in vivoand in vitro. Implantation of GMS-EVs scaffolds showed significantly improved motor recovery, reduced glial scar formation, and enhanced neuronal regeneration compared to both SCI and GelMA-only controls in a rat spinal cord hemisection model. Mechanistically, these beneficial effects of GMS-EVs scaffolds were associated with the stimulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K-AKT) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathways in SCI rats. Overall, this study highlights the potential of scaffolds based on porous GelMA microspheres combined with MSC-EVs to enhance tissue repair in the injured spinal cord environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: