Theoretical analysis outlines a cyclical non-dual ontology from unmanifest potentiality to life and back, suggesting formal operationalizations for developmental states.
This preprint proposes VEDANTA 2.0, formal dynamic ontology from 0 as unmanifest potentiality (model-internal term "luminous possibility"). Core thesis: 0 → Advaita → Dvaita (Jad+Chetan) → Tri-Abhivyakti (Man) → Tam/Raj/Sat → Panchtatva → Jivan → Bodh → Punar 0. Single-point mechanism: Structure → Motion → Saturation → Inquiry → Recognition → De-reification / तम → रज → प्रश्न → सत → बोध → 0 v1.1 adds P6 — Central Developmental Proposition: authentic Sat emerges from Raj saturation and limit-recognition; unresolved Raj + Sat identity → spiritual performance (Raj wearing Sat) operationalized via Spiritual Bypassing, Guru-Dependence, Dogmatism. Ishvara formalized as functional order encountered as necessary at given developmental state — "जिसकी जैसी आवश्यकता, उस अवस्था में वही ईश्वर" — not three Gods but three functional encounters. Dharma as OS, Guru as state, Moksha as recognition, Maya as Cognitive Permanence Bias. Five testable hypotheses H1-H5 with operational definitions (NEO-PI-R, CEI-II, AAQ-II, DOG, ECQ). DISCLAIMER: This is NOT scientifically proven theory. It is formal philosophical framework. Analogies to quantum vacuum, consciousness substrate, panchtatva are philosophical analogies, not scientific equivalence. Open question intentionally left open: Is "0" ontological ground or most useful initial conceptual symbol? — decided by comparative explanatory power, not declaration. ORCID: 0009-0000-8083-0685 | CC BY 4.0
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vedanta2.0 Agyat Agyani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: