Randomized trial shows high empathy pairs achieve superior musical performance despite no overall empathy growth in adolescent musicians, suggesting empathy enhances collaborative execution.
Research shows a positive relationship between collective music-making and empathy development in general music classrooms, but associations between empathy and specific forms of collective instrumental music-making have been underexplored. The purpose of this study was (1) to examine the relationship between different forms of collective music-making and empathy development and (2) to investigate the relationship of co-performer empathy and performance achievement for adolescent instrumental music students. An experimental pre- and post-test design was applied to examine these relationships. High school instrumental music students ( N = 185) were randomly assigned to one of three music-making conditions: improvising dyad (ID; n = 64), notated duet (ND; n = 62), and large performance ensemble ( n = 59). Participants completed musical interventions related to their respective condition assignments for 20 min a week for a period of 8 weeks. Regression analysis was used to compare the pre- and post-test empathy scores of participants in the three music-making conditions. Co-performers in the ID and ND duet conditions were categorised as High–High, High–Low, and Low–Low empathy pairs using gender-weighted medians from pre-test empathy scores and compared pre- and post-test performance achievement for the different pair combinations in the different conditions with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Findings showed that there were no statistically significant differences in empathy development within or between music-making groups. However, High–High empathy co-performers did demonstrate significantly higher levels of performance achievement when compared with Low–Low empathy pairs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casey Schmidt (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: