Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Perspective reveals the necessity of integrating civic reasoning into continuing medical education, highlighting its role in tackling misinformation and navigating public mistrust.
This letter responds to Erlande’s framing of civic education as community capacity building for primary care by arguing that its relevance also extends to continuing medical education (CME). In post-infodemic practice, clinicians need not only updated technical knowledge but also the ability to address misinformation, communicate uncertainty, and engage communities marked by uneven trust in expertise. The letter suggests that CME should more explicitly incorporate locally grounded public problems, communication training for contested digital environments, and reflective attention to accountability to marginalised communities. Civic reasoning, in this view, is part of contemporary professional competence rather than an optional addition to CME.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: