Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates robust target-to-ROV relative localization in rough sea states, indicating improved search-and-recovery tracking precision.
This study addresses target-to-ROV relative localization in an unmanned surface platform-assisted UAV–ROV search-and-recovery system. Because the submerged ROV is not assumed to be visible from the air, the UAV observes the floating target and a GNSS-equipped ROV-associated surface buoy in the same image. The buoy position and target-to-buoy image displacement are combined to construct a world-frame target-position measurement, whose covariance accounts for buoy GNSS uncertainty and correlated image-projection errors. An upward-looking ROV imaging sonar provides range–bearing measurements. A delay-aware extended Kalman filter fuses the asynchronous observations using sea-state- and confidence-dependent covariance adaptation and normalized-innovation gating. ROV acoustic/inertial navigation uncertainty is propagated into the sonar measurement covariance and the reported relative-state covariance, avoiding duplication of the same navigation error in the aerial channel. The method is evaluated using a JONSWAP-based temporal disturbance model, Monte Carlo simulations, and single-factor and joint sea-state–occlusion–delay sensitivity tests. Under the nominal sea-state-5 condition, the proposed method achieves a mean ROV-frame relative RMSE of 0.992 m, compared with 1.083 m for ROV-only localization and 1.054 m for fixed-covariance fusion, with no run exceeding the 5 m divergence threshold. The results demonstrate improved relative-localization robustness within the simulated environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: