Key result
COMPASS-31 scale shows moderate diagnostic accuracy for autonomic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Autonomic dysfunction in diabetic peripheral neuropathy is common yet underdiagnosed, and the validity of the self-administered COMPASS-31 questionnaire compared to standardized autonomic function testing has not been fully established in diabetic populations.
Does the COMPASS-31 questionnaire accurately detect autonomic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to standardized autonomic function testing?
Cross-Sectional (n=72)
No
Does the COMPASS-31 questionnaire accurately detect autonomic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to standardized autonomic function testing?
The COMPASS-31 scale provides a feasible, noninvasive method for preliminary screening of autonomic dysfunction in diabetic peripheral neuropathy, though it has only moderate diagnostic accuracy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
COMPASS-31 lacks sufficient accuracy for clinical screening of autonomic dysfunction in diabetes; leaves open need for validated alternatives in prospective studies.
Background: Autonomic dysfunction is a common yet underdiagnosed complication of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), contributing to increased morbidity. Early detection is critical for prompt management. The Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS-31) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess autonomic symptoms. However, its validity compared to standardized autonomic function testing (AFT) has not been fully established in diabetic populations. Materials and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted at AIIMS Bhopal on 72 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus of more than 1-year duration. Each participant underwent evaluation using the COMPASS-31 questionnaire, heart rate variability (HRV) parameters, and cardiovascular reflex tests according to Ewing’s criteria. Diagnostic accuracy measures – sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) – were calculated using AFT as the reference standard. Correlation analysis was performed between COMPASS-31 scores and HRV parameters. Results: Autonomic dysfunction was identified in 72% of the study population through AFT. The COMPASS-31 scale was abnormal in 36% of cases. It showed a sensitivity of 34.61%, specificity of 60%, PPV of 69.23%, and NPV of 26.08%. Significant positive correlations were found between COMPASS-31 scores and several HRV indices ( r > 0.5, P < 0.001), indicating its potential utility in assessing autonomic symptoms. Conclusions: While the COMPASS-31 scale exhibits moderate diagnostic accuracy, it offers a feasible, noninvasive method for preliminary screening of autonomic dysfunction in DPN, particularly in settings lacking access to comprehensive autonomic testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suchitra et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus / Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (n=72). Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS-31) vs. Autonomic function testing (AFT) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for autonomic dysfunction (Sensitivity 34.61%, specificity 60%, PPV 69.23%, NPV 26.08%). The COMPASS-31 scale demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for autonomic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes, with a sensitivity of 34.61% and specificity of 60% compared to autonomic function testing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: