Controlled trial reveals no significant effect of short-term safflower seed supplementation on fertility or hormone levels in anestrous ewes, suggesting limited benefit during synchronization.
This study investigated the effects of short-term supplementation with safflower seed, a linoleic-acid-rich oilseed, on reproductive performance and endocrine responses in Hungarian Merino ewes during the non-breeding season. Forty-four clinically healthy multiparous ewes were allocated to two equal groups: a control group and a safflower group. Ewes in the safflower group (n=22) received 75 g ewe−1 d−1 of whole safflower seed in addition to the standard ration during the 7 d sponge period, whereas control ewes (n=22) received no oilseed supplementation. All ewes were treated with an intravaginal sponge containing 60 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for 7 d during April. At sponge removal, 500 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) was administered intramuscularly. Ewes showing estrus were mated with proven fertile Merino rams (ewe : ram ratio of 5:1). Blood samples were collected on day 0, day 7, and immediately after mating on the day of estrus to determine serum estradiol (E2) and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto prostaglandin F2α (PGFM) concentrations. Pregnancy was diagnosed by transabdominal ultrasonography 50 d after mating, and reproductive parameters were calculated. Under the present experimental conditions, short-term safflower seed supplementation did not produce statistically detectable improvements in estrus rate, pregnancy rate, lambing rate, or litter size compared with the control group (p>0.05). Serum E2 concentrations increased, whereas PGFM concentrations decreased over time in both groups; however, no treatment effect or treatment × time interaction was detected. In conclusion, supplementation with 75 g ewe−1 d−1 of whole safflower seed during progestagen treatment was not associated with measurable improvements in reproductive outcomes or detectable changes in circulating E2 and PGFM concentrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: