Observational study reveals distinct plant CSR strategies across alpine ecosystems, highlighting divergent community assembly mechanisms under water and energy limitations.
Understanding plant strategies is critical for predicting biodiversity responses to global change. Here we show Grime’s Competitor, Stress-tolerator, and Ruderal (CSR) strategies and assemblages at 543 plots in 246 sites across alpine ecosystems on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, by integrating plant traits with data on geography, climate, soil, disturbance, and productivity. The S-strategy predominates, showing context-dependent variations and environmental determinants. Climate outweighs soil in water-limited meadow and shrubland with higher C-/R-strategies, but the opposite in energy-limited steppe (on R-strategy) and desert with a prevalent S-strategy, reflecting a core trade-off between resource acquisition and stress tolerance. Disturbance conversely impacts meadow and steppe with opposite effects on S- vs. C-/R-strategies. Habitat filtering converges CSR strategies, shifting to neutrality or limiting similarity along gradients, with contrasting trends for C-/S- vs. R-strategies. These results provide a trait-based framework for understanding vegetation change and community reassembly across alpine ecosystems under climate change and grazing pressure. Competitor, stress-tolerator, and ruderal (CSR) strategies of alpine ecosystems suggest context-dependent roles of geography, climate, soil, disturbance, and productivity, with community assembly shifts from habitat filtering to limiting similarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: