Key result
Radial BP measures ~9 mmHg higher than finger readings, influenced by age and insulin resistance.
Why the study?
Agreement between blood pressure levels at the finger and more proximal sites is not straightforward due to interindividual differences in arterial blood pressure gradients.
What factors influence the mean arterial pressure difference between non-invasive radial artery and finger measurements in individuals without cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=574)
What factors influence the mean arterial pressure difference between non-invasive radial artery and finger measurements in individuals without cardiovascular disease?
p-value: p=<0.001
The blood pressure gradient between radial and finger sites is significantly influenced by mean arterial pressure, age, arterial stiffness, and insulin resistance, highlighting the need for caution when interpreting finger plethysmography BP.
Finger plethysmography MAP may diverge from radial values; leaves open need for site-specific validation in research and practice.
Background In clinical practice, blood pressure (BP) is typically assessed using brachial measurements, whereas finger plethysmography is widely used in vascular physiology research. However, agreement between BP levels at the finger and more proximal sites is not straightforward because of interindividual differences in BP gradients along the arterial tree.Methods We investigated factors associated with the mean arterial pressure (MAP) difference between non-invasive radial artery and finger measurements in 574 normotensive and hypertensive individuals without cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or antihypertensive medication. Recordings included pulse wave analysis from radial BP, plethysmographic finger BP, and whole-body impedance cardiography. Radial BP signals were calibrated using oscillometric contralateral brachial artery measurements.Results Simultaneous mean radial and finger BP (systolic/diastolic) were 131/75 and 122/69 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.001). When examined in quartiles of the radial–finger BP gradient, the average MAP difference was –7, 4, 10, and 20 mmHg, respectively. In linear regression analysis (enter method), a greater MAP difference was significantly associated with higher radial MAP (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.001), and stroke index (p = 0.015); and with lower pulse wave velocity (p < 0.001), pulse pressure amplification (p = 0.002), and insulin sensitivity check index (p = 0.022).Conclusions High mean arterial pressure is a major factor contributing to greater blood pressure difference between the radial and finger sites. However, the difference is also more pronounced in the presence of lower large artery stiffness, lower pulse pressure amplification, and higher stroke index, older age, and greater insulin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choudhary et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Normotension and hypertension (n=574). Radial artery blood pressure measurement vs. Finger plethysmography blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Mean arterial pressure (MAP) difference between non-invasive radial artery and finger measurements (p=<0.001). Simultaneous mean radial and finger blood pressure differed significantly (131/75 vs 122/69 mmHg, p<0.001), with the gradient influenced by higher MAP, older age, and greater insulin resistance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: