Commentary highlights the essential role of companion animals across the human lifespan, suggesting that well-being frameworks must expand beyond anthropocentric models.
Throughout the world, people consider pets to be a critical component of their well-being and an integral part of their families. Yet, generally accepted definitions of well-being do not typically consider humans’ relationships with pets. In this commentary, I discuss the growing body of research that indicates that pets are a critical component of the well-being of people, families, and communities throughout the lifespan. I provide a brief overview of research on pets and well-being, followed by discussions of the concept of the “multi-species” family and the growing role of pets in communities. Anthropocentric definitions and measurements of well-being fail to capture the full complexity of our more-than-human communities: recognizing the vital role of pets to human well-being is an important first step to opening up and expanding our human understanding. Based on this mounting evidence, I suggest that definitions and measurements of human well-being should be expanded to include the role and meaning of pets in our lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nadine Dolby (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: