Spatial modeling study demonstrates varying convergence rates across crime frequency and harm metrics across urban census blocks, highlighting persistent disparities in high-crime areas.
We analyse short-term spatial crime dynamics in Mexico City across census blocks nested within neighbourhoods. Using generalised additive spatial models, we examine sigma convergence and beta convergence as bounded-period indicators of a narrowing of spatial disparities in crime, rather than as evidence of long-run structural equilibrium. Results show strong sigma convergence for traditional frequency-based indicators, but weaker convergence for harm-based measures. Beta convergence is robust only for crime harm index per victim (CHIV), whereas the remaining indicators display threshold effects, partial convergence and divergence in high-crime places. Compositional and contextual factors significantly shape these dynamics, and the results should be interpreted in light of the COVID-19 shock and the structural instability detected around 2020/2021. Findings highlight the value of multi-indicator, multi-scale, harm-aware and spatially explicit analyses for identifying where spatial disparities in crime are narrowing, where they are not and what kinds of interventions may be required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vilalta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: