Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review reveals early neuromotor interventions in pediatric acute brain injury are feasible and safe, highlighting the need for standardized reporting of treatment parameters.
AIMS: Acute care is essential for pediatric acquired brain injury (ABI), but finding precise guidelines for implementing and characterizing early neuromotor interventions is challenging. This scoping review explored the modalities and characteristics of neuromotor interventions, aligned with International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and FITT (frequency, intensity, time, and type) criteria, for pediatric populations with ABI in acute care settings. METHODS: Following PRISMA-ScR framework, searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and PEDro for English studies, limited to primary sources of evidence, published between 2000 and October 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on children aged one month to 18 years with ABI in acute care settings. Two reviewers screened and synthesized data on study characteristics, demographic data, clinical variables and types/characteristics of neuromotor interventions. RESULTS: Five of 3,497 screened articles were included. Primary interventions targeted mobilization/visual training (body structures and functions) and balance/gait training (activities). While "frequency" and "type" were consistently reported, "time" and "intensity" were frequently omitted. Outcomes were mixed for traumatic injuries but positive for inflammatory pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: Early neuromotor intervention for pediatric ABI is feasible and safe, but methodological heterogeneity and inconsistent parameter reporting underscore the need for standardized protocols and a core outcome set.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giustetto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: