Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals perceived usefulness drives intention to adopt GenAI funeral coordination among experienced adults, suggesting core safeguards for system design.
Thai Buddhist funeral services constitute a substantial multi-actor service ecosystem that remains largely dependent on conventional, fragmented coordination among bereaved families, temples, service providers, and administrative actors, with limited digital integration. This study reports a pre-deployment acceptance evaluation of a conceptually specified GenAI-assisted funeral-coordination service and proposes an Evidence-to-Design Translation Framework (EDTF) for translating acceptance evidence into initial design and governance requirements. Using non-probability convenience sampling through online recruitment, 342 screened adults with prior funeral-arrangement experience in the Bangkok Metropolitan Area evaluated a standardized vignette and representative interface mockups rather than an operational platform. PLS-SEM was used to examine prospective acceptance under five predefined safeguards: traceability, auditability, contestability and redress, verification, and risk-based human review. Perceived usefulness was the strongest predictor of intention to use, while attitude toward use provided a secondary pathway. The EDTF maps empirically supported user-evaluation signals to candidate workflow features, accountability controls, required records, monitoring indicators, and escalation rules. The findings provide bounded pre-deployment evidence for subsequent prototyping and pilot validation; they do not demonstrate actual adoption, live-system effectiveness, safeguard causality, or realized industry transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boonprasop et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: