Critical review reveals well integrity as the primary leakage vulnerability across underground hydrogen storage sites, highlighting the need for improved sealing materials and monitoring.
Underground storage of green hydrogen is a strategic enabler of large-scale renewable deployment, but its feasibility rests on a hard problem: keeping a small, highly mobile molecule confined underground for decades without safety or environmental risk. This critical review examines the containment mechanisms of hydrogen across underground storage types, focusing on geological barriers, well integrity and sealing materials. We evaluate the containment capabilities of salt cavities, deep aquifers and depleted reservoirs, with particular attention to the viscoplastic, self-healing properties of salt that promote confinement, and to the vulnerabilities of well infrastructure and salt–cement interfaces. Emerging alternatives, including lined rock caverns and repurposed abandoned mines, are assessed alongside their distinct operating configurations and use cases. Leakage mechanisms including diffusion, advection, microcracking, cement degradation and hydrogen–material interactions are analysed alongside geomechanical modelling, microbial activity, monitoring strategies, regulatory frameworks, and techno-economic and environmental considerations, including the integration of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) with underground hydrogen storage. Well integrity emerges as the dominant risk factor across storage types. The review concludes with design criteria, monitoring priorities and research needs to guide the safe, sustainable deployment of underground hydrogen storage, providing a scientific foundation for future numerical and experimental work on storage tightness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talouizet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: