Retrospective cohort study reveals higher lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio associates with strangulated small bowel obstruction, suggesting poor clinical discrimination alone.
Background: Strangulated small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a time-critical emergency, and CT is not always available and is imperfectly accurate, prompting interest in blood-based markers such as the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR). Whether LCR aids early risk assessment is unclear, because any signal may reflect earlier presentation (before CRP rises) or CT-based misclassification. Methods: In a single-centre retrospective cohort of adults hospitalised for SBO, strangulation was defined on contrast-enhanced CT; LCR was calculable in 142 of 200 patients (59 of 80 strangulated, 83 of 120 non-strangulated), and LCR-based analyses were complete-case. Results: A higher LCR was associated with strangulation (adjusted odds ratio 1.31 per log-unit, 95% CI 1.03–1.66; for an internally derived Youden cut-off of LCR > 0.269, adjusted odds ratio 2.42, 95% CI 1.05–5.55), but this attenuated to non-significance after adjustment for presentation time (2.23, 95% CI 0.95–5.21). Discrimination was poor (AUC 0.63): at the cut-off, sensitivity was 67.8% (95% CI 55.1–78.3), specificity was 55.4% (44.7–65.6), the positive likelihood ratio was 1.52 (1.13–2.05), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.58 (0.38–0.88). When markers were oriented consistently, LCR did not discriminate better than CRP alone. Conclusions: An elevated LCR was associated with CT-suspected strangulation but showed poor discriminative power; the proposed threshold is exploratory and requires independent validation rather than clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itagaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: