Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual analysis identifies key mismatches between cultural capabilities research and cultural governance, highlighting the need for realistic policy mandates.
This article examines the gap between expansive research frameworks for understanding culture’s societal significance and the realistic scope of cultural policy. Drawing on the capability approach, ecological perspectives and a layered model of the cultural field, it argues that frameworks such as cultural capabilities are valuable as critical and analytical tools but do not translate straightforwardly into policy mandates. The article identifies scope, temporal, normative, and knowledge-use mismatches between research and governance, proposes principles for a “reasonable” scope of cultural policy and calls for a more reflexive relationship between cultural policy research and cultural governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joar Skrede (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: