Theoretical analysis reveals consciousness as a functional reorganization of intelligence into unified self/world models, suggesting clear causal mechanisms for computational theories.
Debates over whether consciousness is computational often leave the proposed computation unclear. This paper separates five phenomena that are regularly run together: intelligence, conscious deployment, the composite sensory movie, selfhood and qualia. Discrimination, prediction and control can proceed automatically, so intelligence alone is not enough. The theory identifies consciousness with a change in how intelligence is organised. When routine competence is inadequate, or deliberate purpose intervenes, relevant learned capacities are brought into a temporarily unified and manipulable self/world model. Possible continuations of that model can then govern attention, thought and action. Opening transfers authority; maintenance turns a trigger into an episode. Surprise provides a reason to investigate but cannot supply a distinction or skill that the system has never learned. Meaning depends on anticipated consequences for the continuing self. The proposal is neither a claim to have modelled the whole of consciousness nor a claim that software execution proves phenomenality. Its contribution is a specific functional identity thesis with explicit causal seams: recruitment can be disconnected from extra compute, simulation from governance, opening from maintenance, and deployment from later automaticisation. A theory stated at those seams can be challenged one link at a time rather than protected by overall behavioural success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parag Garg (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: