Theoretical analysis reveals how eroding sociopolitical cohesion neutralizes material capabilities in powerful states, suggesting internal cohesion is essential for state survival.
Why do powerful states collapse from within despite retaining substantial military and economic capabilities? This question motivates the Cohesion Theory of Power, which defines effective power as the capacity to mobilize and coordinate material resources for coherent political action. The theory argues that material capabilities become effective only when supported by sociopolitical cohesion across three dimensions: horizontal, vertical, and institutional. It engages with structural and neoclassical realism alongside broader sociological traditions, including Weber, Mann, Ibn Khaldūn, and Barnett and Duvall. The Soviet collapse illustrates how eroding socio-political cohesion rendered vast material capabilities politically ineffective before formal dissolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syed Inam Ali Naqvi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: