Theoretical analysis demonstrates time-dependent Shannon entropy dynamics in 1D squeezed states, revealing how squeezing parameters modulate uncertainty bounds and mutual information.
The time-dependent behaviour of harmonic oscillator squeezed states is examined from the viewpoint of position and momentum space Shannon entropies and their sum. Analytical expressions for these entropies are obtained from a symplectic group approach. The entropy sum returns to the entropic uncertainty bound at different time intervals, and is characterized by the presence of either a maximum (minimum) in the position space Shannon entropy and a minimum (maximum) in the momentum space one. The maximal value of the entropy sum is characterized by equality of position and momentum Shannon entropies. The transition of the entropy sum from the bound to its maximal value is studied, and relations between position and momentum space Shannon entropies are probed. The relation between the position and momentum space entropies is deformed as the value of the squeezing parameter increases. An analysis of the dependence of the Shannon entropies on the squeezing parameter shows different behaviours at different times. Both position and momentum space Shannon entropies exhibit a linear dependence on the parameter when their sum lies on the uncertainty bound. Here, the entropy sum is independent of the parameter. At other times, the relation between the entropies and squeezing parameter is non-linear, and extremal points are present. The entropy sum here is seen to be an increasing function of the parameter. Kullback–Leibler distances between squeezed and unsqueezed densities illustrate that the position or momentum space densities of the squeezed system can revert back to the unsqueezed ones during the time evolution. The phase-space Wigner function, entropy and mutual information are also examined and discussed. The statistical correlation as measured by mutual information is the entropy sum minus its value at the uncertainty bound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García-Chung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: