Qualitative study uncovers emotional vulnerability despite physical security in institutionalized older adults, highlighting the need for dignity-centered long-term care models.
Rapid socio-cultural transformations, including urbanization, migration, and the restructuring of joint family systems, have significantly altered traditional models of older adults care in India. Old age homes, once perceived as culturally stigmatized institutions, are increasingly emerging as alternative residential arrangements for senior citizens. This qualitative study explores the lived experiences, emotional well-being, social integration, health concerns, and identity perceptions of older residents residing in institutional settings. The research was conducted under the framework of the National Service Scheme (NSS) community engagement initiative and involved in-depth interviews and open-ended survey responses from 40 older residents across two old age homes. Thematic analysis generated eight interconnected themes: (1) Family Disintegration and Changing Social Values, (2) Loneliness and Emotional Isolation, (3) Health Vulnerability and Medical Dependency, (4) Adjustment and Adaptive Coping, (5) Social Relationships within Institutional Settings, (6) Perceptions of Institutional Care and Services, (7) Expectations from Youth and Broader Society, and (8) Spirituality as a Meaning-Making Resource. Findings indicate that while institutional environments largely ensure physical security, routine medical care, and basic material support, emotional fulfillment and identity affirmation remain only partially addressed. Residents frequently negotiate feelings of abandonment, diminished authority, and perceived burden alongside gradual adaptation and spiritual resilience. The coexistence of structural care and emotional vulnerability reveals a critical gap between functional adjustment and psychosocial well-being. Beyond the Indian context, the study contributes to international gerontological literature by distinguishing functional adaptation from emotional fulfillment, demonstrating that institutional care may ensure physical security without fully restoring identity, belonging, and psychosocial well-being. The findings support the development of dignity-centered and person-centered long-term care models. Not applicable. This study did not involve a clinical trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bharti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: