Preregistered experimental study demonstrates distinct emotion resemblance cues drive untrustworthiness perceptions across racial groups, indicating race-dependent facial evaluation mechanisms.
What makes faces seem trustworthy versus untrustworthy? People often conflate facial trustworthiness with structural resemblances to specific emotions – angry-appearing faces seem untrustworthy, while happy-appearing faces seem trustworthy. Is this universal across the ethnicity of faces? Across two pre-registered studies, we built computational models of trustworthy appearance from perceivers’ evaluations of Black, White, and East Asian synthetic faces (Study 1 Phase I: N = 405, 72% White; Study 2 Phase I: N = 436, 64% White). We manipulated new male faces to appear (un)trustworthy using the race-specific models, and raters assessed their expressions (Study 1 Phase II: N = 194, 68% White; Study 2 Phase II: N = 513, 70% White). For White targets, untrustworthiness judgments relied on structural resemblances with anger; for Black targets, on structural resemblances to fear and surprise; and for East Asian targets, on structural resemblances to multiple negatively valenced emotions. This inclusive approach broadens our understanding of how faces seem (un)trustworthy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klein et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: