Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the process and output of the Iranian National Blood Pressure Measurement Campaign.
Does a national blood pressure measurement campaign improve awareness and management of blood pressure in the general population?
Does a national blood pressure measurement campaign improve awareness and management of blood pressure in the general population?
A national blood pressure measurement campaign in Iran successfully raised awareness and prompted blood pressure measurement and subsequent care-seeking behavior.
Campaign achieved high process fidelity; leaves open impact on sustained BP control.
BACKGROUND: The Iranian National Blood Pressure Measurement Campaign (INBPMC) was conducted all over the country to raise awareness in different groups of people regarding the importance of blood pressure and persuading them to manage their blood pressure. The present research aimed at assessing the process and output of this campaign. METHODS: For process evaluation, 31 universities/faculties were selected. Experts from the Ministry of Health and Medical Education assessed the documentation of the campaign implementation using the designed checklist. The output was assessed by including 8274 people and through a telephone survey using the designed instructions. RESULTS: The response rate of the telephone interviews was 82.74% (8274 people). It was found that 79% of the selected groups were aware of the INBPMC. Among them, 64% remembered the messages, 99% of the participants who remembered the messages agreed with those messages, and 89% of the participants who agree with the messages went for a measurement of their blood pressure. In the telephone interviews, 30% of the participants stated that they were diagnosed with hypertension, 97% of these participants received the required consultations for subsequent care, and 86% of them went to the health service centers to receive care. The process evaluation of the INBPMC indicated that the universities of medical sciences obtained 97% of the score of the checklist. CONCLUSION: The INBPMC was successful and accomplished its objectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shams et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: