Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessJournal of Urology1 Feb 1982Vesicoureteral Reflux and Staghorn Calculi Thomas F. Lue, Richard J. Macchia, Louis Pastore, and Keith Waterhouse Thomas F. LueThomas F. Lue More articles by this author , Richard J. MacchiaRichard J. Macchia More articles by this author , Louis PastoreLouis Pastore More articles by this author , and Keith WaterhouseKeith Waterhouse More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)53722-2AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail We herein present 2 retrospective reviews on the concurrence of vesicoureteral reflux and staghorn renal calculi. The discrepancy in findings is discussed. Voiding cystourethrography, while advisable in children, is not recommended as a routine procedure in the clinical evaluation of adults with staghorn calculi. © 1982 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byMcGovern J (2018) Editorial CommentJournal of Urology, VOL. 130, NO. 5, (886-886), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1983.Malek R, Svensson J, Neves R and Torres V (2018) Vesicoureteral Reflux in the Adult. III. Surgical Correction: Risks and BenefitsJournal of Urology, VOL. 130, NO. 5, (882-886), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1983.Torres V, Malek R and Svensson J (2018) Vesicoureteral Reflux in the Adult. II. Nephropathy, Hypertension and StonesJournal of Urology, VOL. 130, NO. 1, (41-44), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1983. Volume 127 Issue 2 February 1982 Page: 247-248 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1982 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Thomas F. Lue More articles by this author Richard J. Macchia More articles by this author Louis Pastore More articles by this author Keith Waterhouse More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lue et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: